Based on the actual answers from the executed self-assessment, observing ethics in decision-making processes is an important provision. Individuals and organizations endeavor to uphold ethics in their judgments (Morrison, 2011). This paper discusses what was reflected in answers (from the self-assessment) concerning ethical decision-making. Additionally, it discerns various effects of professional ACHE standards and influences of individual ethics on decision-making processes. Concurrently, some strategies can be adopted to improve ethical judgments in the future. To shore up ethical clinical behaviors, a firm should hold processes that uphold administrative decisions.
What was reflected in the answers of the self-assessment regarding ethical decision-making?
While reflecting on the answers attained from the self-assessment, the significance of ethics in decision-making cannot be assumed. This is based on relevancy and absolute guidance on pertinent issues. Contextually, the answers of the self-assessment reflect clearly on the significance and viability of ethical decision-making on critical issues. Guidance attained from ethical concerns can help in making decisions on controversial issues facing an organization. Accordingly, the answers emanating from self-assessment reflect clearly on the aspects of ethical decision-making due to its importance and virtues (Morrison, 2011).
Ethical decision-making requires stipulated virtues set to guide the entire process. An organization must establish and enact ethical guidelines that can be used to resolve critical ethical issues. These must be verified for validity, relevancy, and vastness in the realms of applicability. This is quite important when considered critically concerning ethical decision-making and other relevant concerns. Setting critical benchmarks for ethical deliveries is important as a guideline to contentious issues.
The effect of professional ACHE standards on ethical decision making, based on the answers of the self-assessment
Based on the answers from the self-assessment, professional standards set by ACHE on ethical issues are important when considered critically. They set the preferred ethical gauges applicable in diverse aspects. ACHE standards set the guidelines meant to enhance ethics within a clinical organization. These standards possess elaborated ethical concerns on decision making as evident from the self-assessment’s answers. Additionally, decisions have to be made in conformity with the ACHE’s standards. This is a prominent provision as it ensures that all decisions made adhere to the ethical concerns within the organization (Bush & AACN, 2008).
It is crucial to understand such provisions in diverse contexts. ACHE standards have been drafted professionally to enhance ethical considerations during decision-making. In this context, it dictates the nature of decisions made on contentious issues. Precisely, ACHE standards provide the ultimate guideline on the concerning ethical issues and decision making indicated earlier. It dictates the entire decision-making process to integrate ethical concerns into the whole process. Based on the answers attained from the self-assessment, the effect of professional ACHE standards on ethical decision-making is evident and considerable. This is concerning the entire ethical decision-making process mentioned earlier.
How individual ethics influence decision making based on the answers of the self-assessment
Based on the answers from the self-assessment, ethics influences decision-making in vast ways. Concurrently, ethical issues act as the guiding principles throughout the entire decision-making process. It is difficult for an individual to defy his or her ethical virtues when making decisions on critical matters. This indicates the importance of having well-set ethical standards at the individual level. In this context, the organization’s ethical standards will augment the already entrenched ethical values within an individual (Nelson, 2005). People make decisions based on their respective ethical values and other virtuous concerns.
This indicates how an individual’s decision-making process can be influenced considerably by his or her ethical values. Contextually, this varies from one individual to the next. It is critical to understand this provision to make critical judgments on pertinent issues. Additionally, an individual’s ethics can dictate his or her vulnerability to adopt the ethical standards set by ACHE. An individual who values and embraces the aspects of ethics in his or her endeavors will demonstrate this provision easily. Precisely, an individual’s ethics is a prominent tyrant in the decision-making process.
Strategies that can be adopted to improve ethical decision making in the future based on the answers to the self-assessment
Based on the answers emanating from the mentioned self-assessment, numerous strategies can be adopted to improve ethical decision-making processes in the future. Firstly, it is important to set ethical standards that must be observed when deciding on pertinent issues. This will act as a guideline on various occasions. Additionally, it is imperative to set a benchmark for the entire decision-making process. It is also important to uphold the code of ethics and missions established and embraced by ACHE. Concurrently, it is critical to executing professional duties with honesty, integrity, respect, evenhandedness, and good faith while observing the stipulations of the law.
Conclusively, it is significant to consider ethical concerns on the aspects of decision-making regardless of the situation. This is evident in the answers attained through the self-assessment mentioned earlier. Concurrently, professional ACHE standards and individual ethics possess various effects on ethical decision-making. Similarly, some strategies can be adopted to improve ethical decisions in the future.
Bush, S. & AACN. (2008). Ethical decision-making in clinical neuropsychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Morrison, E. (2011). Ethics in health administration: A practical approach for decision-makers. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
Nelson, W. (2005). An Organizational Ethics Decision-Making Process. Web.